AWS Textract Implementation Guide: From Setup to Production Skip to content
← Back to Blog

AWS Textract Implementation Guide: From Setup to Production

AWS Textract architecture flow from S3 to Lambda to Textract to A2I to DynamoDB with code example

By Michael Walker, CEO, Horus Technology

A comprehensive guide to implementing AWS Textract for intelligent document processing, based on our experience building production systems for Fortune 500 companies.

AWS Textract is a machine learning service that automatically extracts text, handwriting, and data from scanned documents. Unlike traditional OCR, Textract understands document structure—identifying forms, tables, and relationships between data.

At Horus Technology, we've implemented Textract-based solutions for clients like Ford Credit and Ricoh, and Bedrock-based extraction for Bank of Montreal. This guide shares the architecture patterns and best practices we've learned.

When Should You Use AWS Textract?

Use Textract for forms with key-value pairs, documents with tables, mixed content, and high-volume processing. It excels at:

  • Forms with key-value pairs – Loan applications, tax forms, insurance claims
  • Documents with tables – Invoices, purchase orders, financial statements
  • Mixed content – Documents combining printed text, handwriting, and checkboxes
  • High-volume processing – Thousands of documents per day

Consider alternatives if you need:

  • Simple text extraction from clean PDFs – Use Amazon Comprehend or basic PDF libraries
  • Complex reasoning about document content – Combine with Amazon Bedrock
  • Real-time processing of video/streams – Use Amazon Rekognition

Which Textract API Should You Use?

Use DetectDocumentText for raw text, AnalyzeDocument for forms and tables, and AnalyzeExpense for invoices and receipts. Textract offers three main APIs:

1. DetectDocumentText

Extracts raw text and word bounding boxes. Best for simple text extraction without structure.

import boto3

client = boto3.client('textract')
response = client.detect_document_text(
    Document={'S3Object': {'Bucket': 'my-bucket', 'Name': 'document.pdf'}}
)

2. AnalyzeDocument

Extracts forms (key-value pairs) and tables. Best for structured documents.

response = client.analyze_document(
    Document={'S3Object': {'Bucket': 'my-bucket', 'Name': 'form.pdf'}},
    FeatureTypes=['FORMS', 'TABLES']
)

3. AnalyzeExpense

Specialized for invoices and receipts. Automatically identifies vendor, line items, totals.

response = client.analyze_expense(
    Document={'S3Object': {'Bucket': 'my-bucket', 'Name': 'invoice.pdf'}}
)

What Does a Production Textract Architecture Look Like?

A production pipeline moves documents from S3 through Lambda, Step Functions, asynchronous Textract, SNS, and a results Lambda, with A2I for human review when needed and DynamoDB or RDS for storage. For production workloads, we recommend this architecture:

Component Flow

S3 (Input) → Lambda (Trigger) → Step Functions → Textract (Async) → SNS → Lambda (Process Results) → A2I (If needed) → DynamoDB/RDS (Store)

Key Components

1. S3 for Document Storage

Create separate buckets for input documents, processed results, and failed documents:

  • company-documents-input – Raw uploaded documents
  • company-documents-processed – Extraction results (JSON)
  • company-documents-failed – Documents that failed processing

2. Asynchronous Processing

For documents over 1 page, use async APIs:

# Start async job
response = client.start_document_analysis(
    DocumentLocation={'S3Object': {'Bucket': 'bucket', 'Name': 'doc.pdf'}},
    FeatureTypes=['FORMS', 'TABLES'],
    NotificationChannel={
        'SNSTopicArn': 'arn:aws:sns:us-east-1:123456789:textract-complete',
        'RoleArn': 'arn:aws:iam::123456789:role/TextractRole'
    }
)
job_id = response['JobId']

# Later, get results
result = client.get_document_analysis(JobId=job_id)

3. Step Functions for Orchestration

Use Step Functions to handle retries, parallel processing, and error handling. This is critical for production reliability.

4. Human-in-the-Loop with A2I

Route low-confidence extractions to human reviewers using Amazon A2I. This is essential for maintaining accuracy in critical workflows like loan processing.

Best Practices

1. Handle Confidence Scores

Every Textract extraction includes a confidence score (0-100). Set thresholds based on your accuracy requirements:

  • >95% – Auto-accept
  • 80-95% – Flag for review
  • <80% – Route to human reviewer

2. Optimize for Cost

Textract pricing is per page. Optimize costs by:

  • Pre-filtering documents that don't need OCR
  • Using DetectDocumentText for simple extractions (cheaper than AnalyzeDocument)
  • Batching documents when possible
  • Caching results for duplicate documents

3. Handle Multi-Page Documents

For documents over 1 page, you must use async APIs. Results come in paginated blocks that need to be reassembled:

def get_all_results(job_id):
    pages = []
    next_token = None

    while True:
        if next_token:
            response = client.get_document_analysis(
                JobId=job_id, NextToken=next_token
            )
        else:
            response = client.get_document_analysis(JobId=job_id)

        pages.extend(response['Blocks'])
        next_token = response.get('NextToken')

        if not next_token:
            break

    return pages

4. Structure Your Output

Textract returns raw blocks. Build helper functions to extract structured data:

def extract_key_value_pairs(blocks):
    key_map = {}
    value_map = {}
    block_map = {block['Id']: block for block in blocks}

    for block in blocks:
        if block['BlockType'] == 'KEY_VALUE_SET':
            if 'KEY' in block.get('EntityTypes', []):
                key = get_text(block, block_map)
                value_block = get_value_block(block, block_map)
                value = get_text(value_block, block_map)
                key_map[key] = value

    return key_map

What Are the Common Textract Pitfalls?

The common pitfalls are ignoring document quality, not handling rotated documents, processing synchronously at scale, skipping retry logic, and skipping validation. Here is what each one looks like and how to avoid it:

  • Ignoring document quality – Low-resolution scans dramatically reduce accuracy. Recommend 300 DPI minimum.
  • Not handling rotated documents – Use Textract's orientation detection or pre-process with image libraries.
  • Synchronous processing at scale – Sync APIs have lower throughput limits. Use async for production.
  • No retry logic – Textract can throttle. Implement exponential backoff.
  • Skipping validation – Always validate extractions against expected formats (dates, numbers, etc.)

Real-World Results

Using these patterns, our clients have achieved:

  • Bank of Montreal (Bedrock-based extraction): 65% faster loan processing, $2.1M annual savings
  • Ford Credit: Automated document routing to appropriate departments
  • Ricoh: Complex document workflow automation with human validation

Next Steps

For more complex document understanding—like extracting meaning from unstructured text or handling handwriting—consider combining Textract with Amazon Bedrock. We've seen 92% accuracy on handwritten documents using this approach.

Need help implementing Textract for your organization? Our team has built production document processing systems for some of the largest financial institutions and manufacturers in North America.

See also: AWS Partner San Diego | Salesforce + AI Integration

Get started

Tell us what you're trying to solve.

AWS architecture, a GenAI pilot, document processing, a migration off another cloud — tell us where you're stuck and we'll tell you if we can help. We build in your own AWS account, so what's yours stays yours.